| Time for a change |
|
|
|
Does this add up?
I don't know if it's true or typical for your area but in my area:
(2) Review of ‘parenting’ programmes, see below 2009 (3) Index of Deprivation 2007 (4) Index of Deprivation 2007 (5) Medway Council website From this it is clear that the same old, same old doesn’t add up and we need a different approach. We need to create personal empowerment, aspiration and confidence where families can live together and thrive. In this fast changing world we live in today, parents need new skills. It is time for a change Our unique personal development approach, a combination of advanced coaching and emotional literacy techniques, has not been easy to introduce because we are seen as providing a 'parenting' programme. These tend to make parents feel failures and stigmatised, who wants to feel like that? And the existing family support ‘system’ is locked into an old paradigm of psychology and counselling. Our approach makes parents feel positive, successful and comfortable within themselves.
We are not saying that there is not a place for traditional techniques. What is not being heard is ‘family breakdown’ costs us in excess of £40 BILLION pounds* in direct and indirect costs - EVERY year. So it’s fairly obvious that our current approach is not working. It's time to do something different.
* The Relationship Foundation (2010)
Comparison of models for Family Support
Opportunities within the system Where Children’s Trusts have different Partnership Groups for say Families and Emotional Well Being the commissioning structure may not allow an encompassing intervention. Therefore one programme that can have huge beneficial outcomes is not considered within the normal terms of commissioning.
Extract from Review and future development of parenting programmes in Medway
A report by Kim Roberts, parenting strategy consultant - 5th June 2009
*including creche
Coaches as agents of change The word 'coaching' is often misused when it’s actually mentoring. True coaching empowers and transfers responsibility to the client. Coaches may not be considered 'parenting practitioners' by some because we may not have child care or child development qualifications. That is because we consider the parent is the expert for their child and by empowering them they are able to resolve their issues and unleash the potential in themselves and their whole family.
Also we do not see parents as vulnerable but magnificent individuals. This creates a different energy in our interactions as we are not telling parents what to do, but asking them, using powerful questions, what they need to achieve the desired outcomes with their children. The demand for coaching
Coaching is widely used across business. In fact, some Local Authorities encourage managers to take an advanced coaching course. And yet these same people put barriers in the way of allowing this intervention to be used by the parents they are serving. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) in 2009 found that almost 90% of organisations polled use coaching and of the more than 500 companies surveyed, 51% of them see coaching as a key part of learning and development and consider it 'crucial to their strategy’.
National Academy for Parenting Practitioners
One of our programmes, DYC Family Coach Certificate is on the Commissioners Toolkit with a poor evaluation because we are assessed as a 'parenting' programme which we are not. We have had meetings and discussions with the NAPP over the last 2 years and now they are creating another criteria for this type of programme.
Some recent outcomes
One of our programmes, ‘Parent Champion’ has achieved some very encouraging outcomes:
Everyone who attended has taken away the main outcomes - that parents listen, value and respect their children and themselves – changing the whole family dynamic and breaking a cycle of reactive behaviours. Other outcomes have been:
See the case histories here and here for a full independent evaluation of the pilot programme.
More details of the programme here www.parentchampion.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 31 August 2010 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



